Posted by: sleepyoldbear on: 14 January 2008
As I write this, in the late winter of 2006, we are more than twenty years into the AIDS era. Like many, a large part of my life has been irreversibly affected by AIDS. My entire adolescence and adult life – as well as the lives of many of my peers – has been overshadowed by the belief in a deadly, sexually transmittable pathogen and the attendant fear of intimacy and lack of trust that belief engenders.
To add to this impact, my chosen career has developed around the HIV model of AIDS. I received my Ph.D. in 2002 for my work constructing mathematical models of HIV infection, a field of study I entered in 1996. Just ten years later, it might seem early for me to be looking back on and seriously reconsidering my chosen field, yet here I am.
My work as a mathematical biologist has been built in large part on the paradigm that HIV causes AIDS, and I have since come to realize that there is good evidence that the entire basis for this theory is wrong. AIDS, it seems, is not a disease so much as a sociopolitical construct that few people understand and even fewer question. The issue of causation, in particular, has become beyond question – even to bring it up is deemed irresponsible.
Why have we as a society been so quick to accept a theory for which so little solid evidence exists? Why do we take proclamations by government institutions like the NIH and the CDC, via newscasters and talk show hosts, entirely on faith? The average citizen has no idea how weak the connection really is between HIV and AIDS, and this is the manner in which scientifically insupportable phrases like “the AIDS virus” or “an AIDS test” have become part of the common vernacular despite no evidence for their accuracy.
When it was announced in 1984 that the cause of AIDS had been found in a retrovirus that came to be known as HIV, there was a palpable panic. My own family was immediately affected by this panic, since my mother had had several blood transfusions in the early 1980s as a result of three late miscarriages she had experienced. In the early days, we feared mosquito bites, kissing, and public toilet seats. I can still recall the panic I felt after looking up in a public restroom and seeing some graffiti that read “Do you have AIDS yet? If not, sit on this toilet seat.”
But I was only ten years old then, and over time the panic subsided to more of a dull roar as it became clear that AIDS was not as easy to “catch” as we had initially believed. Fear of going to the bathroom or the dentist was replaced with a more realistic wariness of having sex with anyone we didn’t know really, really well. As a teenager who was in no way promiscuous, I didn’t have much to worry about.
That all changed – or so I thought – when I was twenty-one. …….
The rest is here.
A very interesting read. We can certainly question the HIV-AIDS connection, but we still don’t have the answers. There seems to be evidence of it being a lifestyle disease. I don’t think we can call it a gay disease- perhaps a disease of the promiscuous, but promiscuity crosses the hetero/homo/bi boundaries.
Just as a probably irrelevant sidenote, I happened to stumble across the website that this article is on again today whilst reading this article (ninth paragraph):
http://bidinotto.journalspace.com/?entryid=656
So as interesting as the article is, I’m a bit more wary of it because of the person who actually runs the site.
Deborah: you make a good point, and I paused for a moment before I posted the woman’s essay because of that. However, she did her PhD at Dalhousie U in Halifax, just down the road …
I had a look at Bidinotto, as you pointed out, and I find some of his opinions suspect, also, for example his misreading of the First Amendment. But then, there of plenty of Robed Masters of the Universe who have also been muddled by it.
I value the comments above, and welcome further interventions and links to useful websites.
There are many books, documentaries etc. available on the world wide web which question the HIV/AIDS theory. Don’t wait for it all to find you, look for it yourself if you’re really interested in learning. Google things like rethinking AIDS , reappraisal of AIDS and so on… Good luck.
Sadun: I agree with you. I think we have been sold another pseudo-scientific ‘theory’. Another generation will look upon us as a bunch of dodos.
hi, I have a doubt that aids may be developed through scientific epidemics,ok then there must be medicine for it na.
My questions are,does aids really comes to
1. Lesbian,
2. Homosex,
& men and women with these diseases
14 January 2008 at 16:38
Okay, but you don’t have to be gay to get the disease. Lots of straight men and women have the disease. The numbers are certainly higher in the gay community but that could just be a symptom of the gay craze of the late seventies and early eighties, lots of sex with many partners while on drugs and other assorted gems of mind destruction. I am still not entirely comfortable with labelling it a gay disease but I will admit it certainly is portrayed that way.